Class Session 5: Teaching Methodologies, Part II: Active Learning: Why and How by MIT OpenCourseWare

Description

Class Session 5: Teaching Methodologies, Part II: Active Learning: Why and How by MIT OpenCourseWare

Summary by www.lecturesummary.com: Class Session 5: Teaching Methodologies, Part II: Active Learning: Why and How by MIT OpenCourseWare


  • Learning Outcomes and Measurability

    • Overall, well done on the learning objectives; they are primarily realistic, quantifiable, and specific.

      Making sure learning outcomes are quantifiable was the biggest challenge.

      It is impossible to quantify words like "appreciate."

      "Discuss" may be quantifiable, but it necessitates establishing a discussion space and monitoring it.

      It was good that terms like "understand" were avoided.

      Although terms like "explain" and "describe" are useful, it's important to ensure that students are actually explaining or describing rather than merely memorizing or repeating definitions. They must create scenarios in which they can genuinely describe or explain.

      Methods for Evaluating Genuine Understanding

      • Adjust the parameters, such as asking about an organism in an oxygen-free world, to compel students to transfer and re-explain.
      • An example from a kinetics class: altering the form for calculating the critical nucleus size made students reapply ideas rather than merely memorize a technique.
      • Consider how to assess students' ability to derive something more than just memorize a derivation.
      • These are typically the most significant issues with learning outcomes.

      A Brief Overview of Technology and Active Learning Approaches

      A web-enabled device for "backchannel" technology was mentioned.

      One technique that could benefit students, particularly in large classes, is Backchannel.

      Students can type anonymous questions, vote for or against other people's questions, and the teacher can read and respond to them.

      Excellent for students who are shy.

      The day's topic is active learning.

      Resolving Mud Card Enquiries & Student Involvement

      • Students falling asleep in class.
      • Students can stay awake and involved with the support of active learning.
      • It is difficult to fall asleep when engaging in pair or small group activities.
      • Examples include the lightning round, which makes it nearly impossible to sleep.
      • Making class worthwhile for students is crucial, and active learning facilitates this.
      • It's a chance to reconsider tactics if the entire class is nodding off.
      • The instructor's schedule and the student body's preferences will determine the best times of day for lectures (undergrads are less interested in early mornings).
      • Guiding readings: Before class, post reading prompts or questions to help students concentrate.
      • Students respond to pre-class questions based on their readings.
      • Just-in-time teaching: students respond to reading-related questions prior to class, which compels them to read and directs their focus. With efficient methods, it can work well for big classes.

      Review of Conventional Lecture (Juggling Analogy)

      An analogy would be attempting to teach juggling solely through equations and graphs.

      Shows that teaching or learning how to do something (juggle) is not the same as presenting information (equations, paths).

      Only those who knew ahead of time would pass a juggling test.

      It draws attention to the fact that most classes are taught in this manner: by giving information without emphasizing what the students should do with it (manipulate, transfer, apply equations).

      Encouragement to consider what we truly want students to be able to do and adjust our instruction accordingly.

      A Brief Overview of the Active Learning Debate Exercise

      The readings go over active learning strategies, their benefits, and supporting data.

      Acknowledges a variety of audience buy-in.

      Exercise: Act as though you are in a STEM department.

      The department proposes to allocate funds for faculty training and resource development in order to implement active learning in all courses by the year 2017.

      Objective: Within a year, bring all courses up to speed with active learning.

      Initiating the Discussion

      • Group formation involves counting off 1-2-3.
      • Groups physically relocate to various locations.
      • Group 1 (Pro): Make the case for approving the proposal.
      • Group 2 (Con): Make an argument not in favour of approving the proposal.
      • Group 3 (Deciders): Hear arguments, make decisions, and make a decision for the department.
      • Give the group ten minutes to prepare.
      • Plan: One debate question exchange, two to three minutes of pro and con spiel, questions from the deciders, and deliberation.
      • Pro Arguments

        • Professors turn to lecturing, which is viewed as ineffective, in the absence of active learning.
        • Presentation of material does not guarantee that students will learn it.
        • Active learning guarantees that students are paying attention and comprehending; lecturing wastes resources.
        • Active learning is a life skill acquired through problem-solving, talking, and doing.
        • Pupils retain information that they use. They are less likely to remember information if they cannot solve problems.

        Con Arguments

        • Why alter what is effective?
        • Current system prepares students for employment, grants are awarded to professors, and university ratings are satisfactory.
        • Adoption will cost a lot of money for research, equipment, and hiring postdocs and scientists, diverting funds.
        • Training professors will take a lot of work as they are accustomed to current approaches and might not want to change.
        • Concerns of stakeholders: Parents and alumni are accustomed to conventional approaches.
        • Time constraints to finish the syllabus; only 50% of topics may be covered by active learning.
        • Very large classes (e.g., 500 students) present challenges in controlling classes and achieving tangible outcomes.
        • The system is functioning; let it continue.

        First Round of Debate: Pro/Con Questions

        • Make the case that because the status quo isn't working, the system is changing.
        • Active learning has been shown to improve student learning outcomes. What does Con think about this study?

        First Round of Debate: Con Reactions

        • Good students learn in any situation; perhaps concentrate on attracting them.
        • Funding problem: a major issue with the proposal is that it takes money away from research.
        • Why change if the current setting is effective and good students can learn there?

        First Round of Debate: Pro Counter

        • Don't "throw away the baby with the bathwater"—that is, don't get rid of students who aren't "good" students.
        • The goal of the proposal is for every student to actively participate and learn.
        • Economical to encourage active learning from every student.
        • Short timeline (2017 target from the end of 2015) raises concerns again.

        Round 1 of the Debate: Con Response (Continued)

        • Training professors who are set in their ways in a short period is reiterated.
        • Difficulties in diverting funds and personnel from laboratories during this period.

        Student Remark: Viewpoint on Funding

        • Con only brought up the topic of taking money away from labs and research, not from anything related to students.
        • Professors are meant to instruct students.
        • Educational experience of students is important to good professors.
        • Compassionate instructors are open to modifying their methods.
        • Why no mention of transferring funds between educational initiatives?

        First Round of Debate: Con Response (Concluding)

        • Proposal opposed due to the time frame (2017 target from the end of 2015/2016) and unidentified funding/resource diversion.
        • Uncertain if training will be effective.

        Student Question to Con: Adoption Lag

        • Why isn't active learning more popular if it's so effective and research on it dates back to the 1980s?

        Pro Response: Historical Background of Instruction

        • Practice of lecturing began when printing was nonexistent.
        • New system is required due to changes in motivation for lecturing.

        Deciders Pose Questions

        • Arguments for compliments.

          Deciders' Question to Pro: Big Classes

          What is the potential impact of active learning on large classes (500 students, for example)?

          Do some classes not lend themselves well to active learning?

          Pro Response: Peer Learning & Active Learning in Large Classes

          There are instances of active learning in large freshman classes (700–800 students).

          The method involves:

          • Asking a question
          • Having students click on the answers
          • Talking to their neighbours
          • Voting on the answers

          According to research, peer-to-peer communication helps students learn material more effectively than expert instruction.

          Deciders' Remark/Question to Con: Education as a Right

          Con's claim that intelligent students "get it" is noted.

          Enquires whether all students, regardless of their starting skill level, do not have the right to an education. Why not include a child who isn't "smart enough"?

          Con Response: Legacy & Conventional Methods

          The traditional method is the best education, according to this argument.

          It is possible for active learning to take place outside of the classroom.

          The current approach is effective and has a legacy; it has been used for more than 300 years at Harvard and more than 100 years at MIT.

          Every system has issues; the lecture has a few small inefficiencies, but it is reliable and functional.

          Follow-up to Con: Assessing Professor Performance

          How is a professor's performance evaluated if they only teach theory and intelligent students understand it?

          How do student assessments of the quality of education get taken into account?

          Con Response: Graduate Success & Assessment via Assessments

          Students are compelled to read through homework, tests, and exams; the professor does not need to be very involved. They return with new knowledge.

          A significant portion of MIT graduates succeed (found jobs, launch businesses). This indicates that the system is operational.

          Tests and lecture delivery are evaluated. The system has been excellent and ought to stay that way.

          Deciders' Question to Pro: Measuring the Implementation of Active Learning

          How can the amount of active learning required in classrooms be measured?

          How can one make sure the right amount is used, particularly for instructors who might only use a few techniques?

          Pro Response: Research, Standards, and Oversight

          To determine what proportion of time should be devoted to active learning activities (e.g., 30% or 70%), consult the research again.

          A standard based on efficacy must be established.

          The department's oversight is crucial.

          Leadership in the department ought to watch classes.

          Training for professors must be prolonged, involve observation and feedback, and go beyond a brief seminar.

          Deciders Discuss & Declare Their Choice

          Due to time constraints, the exercise was cut short.

          The panel found the benefits of active learning to be persuasive.

          The current proposal should be rejected because of its aggressive timeframe (disruptive), high estimated cost, and lack of a proven way to measure success at scale.

          Before choosing to make a larger investment, allocate funds to a pilot program to gauge its success.

          Examination of the Exercise

          The purpose of the exercise was discussed (took about 45 minutes).

          Encourages participants to consider if the time is worth it.

          This discussion probably takes place in departments, particularly when it comes to student outcomes.

          Gives one the chance to reflect carefully on the topic.

          Encourages critical thinking even when it goes against one's personal beliefs.

          Exhibits active learning in action.

          It is beneficial for students to adopt arbitrary stances and make arguments in order to gain knowledge that they would not otherwise acquire.

          By avoiding putting like-minded people together, it prevents the reinforcement of preexisting beliefs.

          When there are two distinct points of view, this method works well.

          More interesting than merely using lectures and slides to outline advantages and disadvantages.

          Having to develop arguments forced me to think more deeply about concepts.

          Evidence in Favour of Active Learning

          The article by Scott Freeman (in the reading list) is cited. A meta-analysis of 225 studies revealed that classes that used active learning had a 12% lower failure rate.

          This finding is so important that it would be necessary to halt a clinical drug trial and administer the medication to all participants.

          Using active learning, it compares seasoned lecturers to new instructors; the results seem to be definitive. It also recognizes that there are implementation problems and snags.

          Additionally, there is a significant change in letter grades (more students go from C to B, B to A). This is important as well.

          Active Learning as Formative Evaluation & Feedback

          Active learning strategies can serve as formative assessments of students' comprehension. These are exercises that assess students' learning as well.

          • For instance, the debate exercise demonstrated comprehension of the texts.
          • Informs both the learner (where they stand) and the teacher (what students know, misconceptions).
          • Students receive instant feedback on their comprehension through clicker questions or by taking part in activities like the lightning round.

          The Viewpoint of Students Regarding Group Feedback

          According to readings, students are inspired to step up when they witness their peers succeeding when they are having difficulty. Seeing instantaneous peer understanding is a powerful motivator, as opposed to receiving a poor grade.

          The Advantages of Formative Assessment

          • The student receives "news you can use"—actionable information.
          • If students follow the advice, they won't be penalized for making mistakes. This is a major advantage.

          A Range of Active Learning Methods

          There are numerous methods (nearly 200 are listed on the University of South Florida website). The instructor intends to show a number of methods ("fuagra method" - cramming them in).

          • Examples include a writing prompt or minute paper at the beginning of class to help students stay focused.
          • Active learning: students solving a problem or thinking/writing on their own can occur in large classes (for example, "Stop and think, answer this question" in a 3000-person class).
          • Interactive learning: typically entails students conversing with one another. The majority of general categories are dynamic and participatory.

          The following techniques were mentioned or planned: Clickers/Plickers, Think-pair-share, Jigsaw, Diffusion demo using students, Mud cards, Image/Graph annotation with pointer passing, and Lightning round.

          Gradually introduce active learning using brief strategies that don't necessitate significant disruptions.

          Beach Ball Method

          Technique demonstration: toss a beach ball, and the person who catches it shares an active learning experience. It relieves the instructor of the duty of calling on the class.

          Beach Ball: Student Experiences Shared

          Technology Enabled Active Learning (TEAL) class experience. Three-person groups work on problems for two hours, present their work on the board, and then the teacher reveals the solutions.

          Problem: Usually, just one person wrote everything. Students' opinions are divided, whether they like it or not.

          Research indicates that even if students dislike active learning, they learn and retain more of it.

          Cultural Aspects of Adoption of Active Learning

          Cultural factors may influence student buy-in. It's more accepted if everyone does it and it's expected. An incubation period may be necessary for change.

          In Denmark, for instance, new faculty members must complete a year-long teaching course. Even at a reputable research university, this is the standard.

          Difficulties with Tenure & Faculty

          It's challenging to persuade professors with over 25 years of experience to embrace new methods. Systemic change is necessary.

          Requirements for the tenure system must be modified to encourage the adoption of active learning. It is problematic to expect non-tenured faculty to do this work without altering tenure requirements.

          The Genre of Lab Courses

          Students participated in lab courses that included practical lab work and brief lectures, such as mouse embryology. The instructor affirms that lab courses can be classified as a separate genre.

          Movement to combine instruction with hands-on activities (e.g., WPI studio labs, TEAL). An argument for active learning is made by the fact that excellent lab courses are amazing and teach a lot.

          Asking Questions & Waiting Time

          "What questions do you have?" is a more hospitable question than "Is anyone lost?" The significance of waiting after posing a query.

          • Give pupils 30 seconds to reflect and come up with a response.
          • The 30 seconds must be timed by the instructors; otherwise, they will underestimate it.
          • To give everyone, not just the fastest student, time, it is possible to declare, "I'm not taking answers for 30 seconds.

            Clickers/Plickers Method

            Clickers are used to get feedback. However, dedicated clickers could be expensive for departments or students. An alternative is to use the library's clickers. Smartphones and laptops are necessary for online formats such as Socrative and Poll Everywhere (possible bias). Plickers use cards that are scanned by smartphones; students don't have to pay. Additionally, hand signals or index cards can be used, though they are challenging in large classes.

            Advantages of Clickers

            One advantage is that clickers and online resources offer a histogram for instant feedback on misconceptions and understandings shared by the entire class.

            Plickers Demo

            • Shows how to scan Plickers cards.
            • The histogram result is displayed.
            • It enables the teacher to see how the class has distributed the answers and spot any misunderstandings.
            • For instance, a non-trivial number selected the wrong response, suggesting a miscommunication.
            • Links to articles by Freeman and Hake that provide evidence in favor of active learning.
            • It's important to note that active learning does not necessarily require group projects; it can also involve individual writing or thought processes.
            • It is possible to uncover misconceptions.
            • Effective questions use focused distractions, or incorrect responses intended to highlight particular misconceptions.

            Clicker Question/Conceptual Question Demo

            A conceptual query concerning the sound pitch produced by tapping thick versus thin blocks. The initial distribution of votes across the various options was surprisingly uniform. This emphasizes how the instructor can learn from the distribution of responses. Carefully selecting distractions is essential; incorrect responses ought to disclose something about the comprehension or misunderstanding of the students.

            Clicker Adoption Procedure

            When adopting clickers, instructors usually follow these three steps:

            1. Straightforward fact-based inquiries.
            2. More difficult conceptual queries. Peer discussion is useful.
            3. Redesign the lecture to be entirely question-based, with navigation based on student responses.

            It is advised to begin with step 2, rather than step 3. Unless you're checking reading completion in a large class, Step 1 (fact questions) might be a waste of time. Make an effort to ask insightful questions; perhaps ask fewer. Questions serve as a gauge and an educational exercise.

            Backchannel Check-in

            One participant used the backchannel, which was checked.

            Lightning Round Technique

            Getting ready for the workout. Pupils rise and line up in two rows, facing one another. In response to a query (e.g., temperature change based on NASA data), every pair has a brief two-minute discussion during which one person answers the question and explains why, and the other person answers, asks questions, and shares their ideas. Pairs switch places after two minutes. The objective is rapid idea sharing; it will be noisy.

            Debriefing on Lightning Round

            • Students converse with one another, which makes the method effective.
            • It is easier for students to learn from one another.
            • Effective because, although they begin with their own opinions, students engage with others and look for better ideas.
            • Assists in determining whether their original decision was correct.
            • Benefit: It is difficult for someone to avoid taking part in a pair. Not as intimidating as addressing the entire class.
            • Requires a post-event debrief. Find the answers, clear up misunderstandings, and disclose the right response.
            • Students are exposed to a variety of arguments and explanations.
            • 0.04 degrees Celsius (B) is an example response.
            • When given several compelling, opposing arguments, it could be perplexing.
            • Confusion is acceptable for a while, according to the instructor. By analyzing explanations and determining why inaccurate ones are incorrect, debriefing helps to clear up confusion. This is a crucial educational exercise.
            • It works best for concepts that students may find challenging or for answers that are ambiguous rather than for precise facts.

            Think-Pair-Share Method (In conjunction with Clickers)

            Incorporating a clicker question into Think-Pair-Share. A conceptual query regarding the sound pitch produced by tapping thick versus thin blocks once more. First, each student casts their own vote. The initial distribution is not disclosed by the instructor. Students then debate why they selected their response in small groups of three to four people. To learn about students' mental models and ways of thinking, the instructor walks around and listens in without confronting them, giving the instructor useful information.

            Following discussion, students have the opportunity to vote again, able to track change by saving successive histograms. Following discussion, the distribution in the demo stayed the same. Considering other data, this was surprising. One possible next step would be to ask students to present arguments for various responses. The instructor is now aware of the various approaches students are taking to the issue. To keep the audience interested, the instructor holds off on providing the right response.

            • Follow-up Questions for Think-Pair-Share

              To find out who changed their response, ask for a show of hands.

              Enquire about the answer's level of confidence. Even when there is a high percentage of right answers, low confidence indicates that further discussion is required.

              Examination of the Block Tapping Question

              The thicker block should have a higher pitch.

              Common misunderstandings include:

              • Cello/violin analogy
              • Mansion doors

              The pertinent physics includes:

              • Standing waves
              • Free vibration vs. fixed endpoints (like xylophones)

              In analogy, a stiff diving board has a shorter wavelength (higher note), while a thin diving board has a longer wavelength (low note).

              Cavities (door, cello) use various models of standing waves.

              The technique is great for addressing flawed models and learning about students' misconceptions.

              Assignment After Class

              Consider the active learning strategies you want to use.

              Adjust them and foresee problems.

              The University of South Florida's list of techniques and reference slides with links are included.

              Follow-up on Mud Cards

              After class, offer to comment on the mud cards.